When New Zealand 60 Minutes reporter Sarah Hall wrapped her arms around a tearful Emma Carter in the final seconds of its To die for episode on the death of her daughter, Sarah Carter, few people could be forgiven for thinking that the evidence was overwhelming. That chlorpyrifos poisoning was to blame, and Chiang Mai authorities were guilty of a sinister cover-up.
However, while 60 Minutes was careful to use the word “theory” twice in the programme, statements by its expert scientist, Dr Ron McDowall, in the final minutes of the programme that the symptoms exhibited by Ms Carter prior to her death “perfectly” fitted with chlorpyrifos poisoning, left little room for doubt in most people’s minds.
On this newsblog and other websites a number of people were quick to point out that the tiny amounts of chlorpyrifos found in swabs taken from the room by Ms Hall, 0.10 micrograms per million, were insufficient to kill. That for death to occur via skin absorption and inhalation the room would have had to be literally dripping with the chemical.
Shortly after the 60 Minutes episode Chiang Mai Provincial Governor, ML Panadda Disakul, struck back at the programme, claiming there was no medical proof to substantiate the claims made that chlorpyrifos applied by a fumigator was to blame.
The report also angered what are arguably New Zealand’s three leading toxicologists, Dr Wayne Temple, director, of New Zealand’s National Poisons Centre (NPC), Dr Michael Beasley, a medical toxicologist at the NPC, and Dr John Reeve, the principal adviser (toxicology) for the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, and a member of the World Health Organization (WHO) roster of experts for the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives.
Chlorpyrifos claim misleading
The three New Zealand scientists were so concerned over the conclusions presented and the manner in which they were derived that they fired off an angry letter to the programme, accusing it of misleading Ms Carter’s parents “into believing that they now know what caused their daughter’s death”.
The letter describes the 60 Minutes swabbing of hotel rooms at the Downtown Inn in Chiang Mai as “naive”, pointing out that swabs were not taken from rooms other than that in which Ms Carter had stayed making “the results of the tests of little value.
“Clearly, for the pesticide to be implicated in the illness, it would be expected that the rooms in which those who became ill were sleeping would have much higher levels of chlorpyrifos in them; while if all rooms had similar (and/or only trace) levels of pesticide in them, this would indicate that it was unlikely that the pesticide had anything to do with the illness reported on”, the statement said.
The three toxicologists also criticised the appropriateness of the programme’s “scientific expert”, Dr McDowall, stating “it appears the that the “experts” used on the programme had little or no relevant expertise because they concluded that chlorpyrifos was the causative agent”.
The letter concludes by highlighting that the NPC has toxicology experts available to the media and questions why this resource was not tapped, and predicts that the programme “might be obliged to contact the parents again to correct the probably misleading conclusions that your programme has drawn”.
Chlorpyrifos “only a theory”
Dr Michael Beasley confirmed the letters authenticity and referred comment on behalf of the authors to Dr John Reeve, who said “the parents know no more now than before the report”.
“Organophosphates such as chlorpyrifos are picked up fairly quickly in laboratories and while it dissipates from the body fairly quickly, if levels are such to cause death they would be detectable for about six weeks post-mortem”, he said.
Responding to the letter, 60 Minutes New Zealand reporter Sarah Hall said the programme “never unequivocally said that chlorpyrifos was the cause of Sarah Carter’s death — although I note this is how it was reported in Thailand”.
“What we said is that traces had been found and it was a theory. We said that it was just a theory at least twice in our story”.
Ms Hall attached a letter from Dr McDowall in which he concludes with: ‘In the absence of food poisoning, virus, and any other pathology, the OP poisoning was put forward as a theory’.
Ms Hall ended her reply with: “I think you may agree he [Dr McDowall] has far more practical experience than the toxicologists named in your letter”.
Shown the 60 Minutes New Zealand and Dr McDowall’s response, Dr Reeve said that while Dr McDowall, “is clearly very expert in his field of toxic waste‚ our contention is that their expert does not have relevant experience.
“What is clear from Dr McDowall’s comments is that his expertise is clearly in toxic waste, and his relevant experience (in toxicology) is essentially self-taught.
Highlighting part of Dr McDowall’s response in which he states: ‘Many of the deaths involving OPs were from women using paraquat or chlorpyrifos as a suicide agent’, Dr Reeve states: ‘Paraquat is not an OP as the beginning of his sentence implies. Paraquat is a well-known suicide agent and its toxicity does not present as OP poisoning at all’.
Regarding the heart damage found in some of the Chiang Mai tourist deaths, Dr Reeve says, “notwithstanding Dr McDowall’s comment, the Poisons Centre experts say that myocarditis is very rare in OP poisoning, and while not all of the classic signs may be seen in any one case, many would be present. We are not aware of any case where actual OP poisoning did not present with depressed acetylcholinesterase”.
Acetylcholinesterase, also known as AChE, is an enzyme that degrades the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, producing choline and an acetate group, and is also found on the red blood cell membranes.
Victims would have to have been soaking in chlorpyrifos
Agreeing with comments posted on previous stories here, Dr Reeve said “the toxicity of chlorpyrifos via skin absorption is quite low — the victims would have to be soaking in it to absorb enough to cause severe illness and death, and it has a smell that one could not fail to notice.
“Analytical detection methodology these days is so good that extremely small levels of chlorpyrifos can be detected.
“Even with a half-life of hours (as chlorpyrifos has) the amount that would have to have been in the body to cause death would have been sufficiently high that it is inconceivable that it could not still be found in the samples taken when the victims reached hospital.
“Further, all OPs cause depression of acetylcholinesterase and as the bonding of OPs to this enzyme is chemical, regeneration of levels in blood can only arise from replacement of blood cells and this usually takes up to six weeks, so the depression would have been found”.
Dr Reeve sad that his and his colleges view was that while 60 Minutes claim they only presented chlorpyrifos as a theory, “I certainly did not detect that, and Dr McDowall certainly claimed that the signs in the victims exactly matched those of chlorpyrifos poisoning — a claim that we dispute and suggest in fact that none of the signs matched.
“One can only conclude that the story mislead the parents of Sarah Carter as they stated that they now knew what had killed their daughter. “These clusters [of deaths] occur and it’s quite possible a common cause won’t be found”, he said.
Feature video Channel 10
- Toxicologists concerns about 60 Minutes Story on Sarah Carter’s death in Thailand
- Statement relating to death of Sarah Carter in Chiang Mai
- Thailand authorities dismiss chlorpyrifos as cause of Chiang Mai hotel tourist deaths
- Chiang Mai tourist death hotel mystery remains, governor slams foreign media report
- Dow chemical’s chlorpyrifos pesticide found in Chiang Mai tourist death hotel
- Lost smiles in LOS as Thailand travel tragedies website goes live
He has spent extensive periods of time working in Africa and throughout Southeast Asia, with stints in the Middle East, the USA, and England.
He has covered major world events including Operation Desert Shield/ Storm, the 1991 pillage in Zaire, the 1994 Rwanda genocide, the 1999 East Timor independence unrest, the 2004 Asian tsunami, and the 2009, 2010, and 2014 Bangkok political protests.
In 1995 he was a Walkley Award finalist, the highest awards in Australian journalism, for his coverage of the 1995 Zaire (now Democratic Republic of Congo) Ebola outbreak.
Most recently he was the Thailand editor/ managing editor of AEC News Today . Prior to that he was the deputy editor and Thailand and Greater Mekong Sub-region editor for The Establishment Post, predecessor of Asean Today.
In the mid-80s and early 90s he owned JLF Promotions, the largest above and below the line marketing and PR firm servicing the high-technology industry in Australia. It was sold in 1995.
Opinions and views expressed on this site are those of the author’s only. Read more at About me
Latest posts by John Le Fevre (see all)
- Does Thailand’s failure to communicate mask a bigger problem? – May 25, 2015
- Songkran Bangkok 2015 photo special (gallery) – April 15, 2015
- Asean’s “growth Olympian” unveils FDI offensive at regional investment conference (video) – March 28, 2015
- Camera Drones: a necessary tool of 21st century photo-journalism, but concerns remain – November 17, 2014